Tools, buyer list updated 16 oct 2026
Which buyers fit your data?
37 buyers publish a way to sell them data, and each sets its own rules. Answer a few questions and see who takes what you hold and whose rules you meet.
What you hold
The company today
People at its largest
Years of records
Based in
Language of the records
24 buyers take this kind of data, and you meet the published rules of 7.
- Handshake AIYou meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- "Payouts range from $100K to $4M." Its estimator shows $383,083 to $896,969 for 100 employees and 10 years.
- How the holder is paid
- "Payment terms are negotiated as part of your agreement and tied to defined delivery milestones." It says an initial review and pricing come within 12 to 24 hours of the details it needs, and the whole process typically takes 7 to 14 business days (FAQ on its data-partnerships page, 17 Oct 2026).
- micro1You meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- $100k+ for a qualified partnership, $500k+ for large or multi-team datasets, $1M+ for highly unique data.
- How the holder is paid
- Not published.
- Turing (Lazarus)You meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- "A single payout of up to $1M" for an operating record. For code repositories its process page (lazarus.turing.com/process, read 16 Oct 2026) says "Repos typically pay $10k–$100k+ depending on quality and complexity".
- How the holder is paid
- One payment after a sample review and a final offer. Intake call within one business day under NDA.
- OoakYou meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- "Earn up to $1M" (raised from $300K by 15 Oct 2026). Deals to date run from $20K to several hundred thousand dollars.
- How the holder is paid
- 2 to 4 weeks, paid to the company, not to individuals.
- MercorYou meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- No figures. "Compensation is based on data volume, the tools you connect, and the depth of your data."
- How the holder is paid
- By wire on delivery of the anonymised dataset, typically within 2 to 4 weeks of the signed agreement.
- NyneYou meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- "Partnerships are commonly worth $100K or more." It says it will beat a qualifying written offer for the same data.
- How the holder is paid
- Not published. A 15-minute scoping call comes first.
- SimpleClosure AssetHubYou meet its published rules
- Publishes about price
- "Tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for unique assets". Early deals were reported at $10,000 to $100,000.
- How the holder is paid
- Not published.
- Mode (BizBuyData)Publishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "The operating history of companies and nonprofits could be worth $100K-$5M."
- How the holder is paid
- A nonbinding letter of intent within 14 days; once the final offer is accepted Mode collects and de-identifies the data over 15 to 30 days, and its launch release expects payment in about 60 days.
- PolysharesPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- Typical licences of $100K to $2M, sometimes more. Its track record page lists four anonymous licences from $110,000 to $450,000.
- How the holder is paid
- An offer within one to two weeks of intake; payment net 30 to 60 days after the data is approved and anonymised.
- SuperAnnotatePublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "Indicative $100K – $1M+", priced on rarity, depth and exclusivity.
- How the holder is paid
- "Payment on delivery, and on each relicense."
- Labelbox (Prism)Publishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "Smaller targeted datasets starting around $50K and large enterprise partnerships reaching $1M+".
- How the holder is paid
- "From first call to first wire in under 21 days", with a written quote within 48 hours of scoping.
- TroveoPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "AI labs and startups are actively paying six figures for company data exports", and Troveo pays the holder "on every sale, not just the first".
- How the holder is paid
- For in-demand datasets, signed deal to first payout in under a month.
- HalluminatePublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- Not published
- How the holder is paid
- Not published
- GreppedPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- Its own pages cite $20K to $5M per company; its estimator shows a sample of $29K to $41.5K.
- How the holder is paid
- Within 7 days of the data passing review; it says most companies take two to three weeks from form to payment.
- FileYieldPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- No figures. It charges sellers 8% and buyers 6% commission.
- How the holder is paid
- Buyer and seller agree payment terms in their own contract.
- Corpus BridgePublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- It cites licences of about $10,000 to several hundred thousand dollars for ordinary companies.
- How the holder is paid
- The buyer pays on contract milestones, for example half on signature and half on delivery.
- HUMXN Research LabsPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "$250K+ Where typical data deals for a single company start, with larger archives reaching the millions." Workers earn $20 per hour of approved footage.
- How the holder is paid
- Not published
- AppenPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- No figure published. "Terms are agreed in writing before extraction begins"; price follows uniqueness, how connected the systems are, volume and how far back the records go.
- How the holder is paid
- "Payment is on acceptance rather than submission."
- CentificPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- No figure published. Price follows volume, the applications connected, the complexity of the work, data quality and whether comparable data exists.
- How the holder is paid
- "We agree to the terms in writing before extraction begins. Payment is made when the data is accepted."
- Collinear AIPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- No figure published; "We usually quote an initial range within a day." The price rises with 15 or more people at peak, several years of history, pull requests with their tickets, human-written code and the same work visible across several tools.
- How the holder is paid
- "We confirm delivery is complete, then pay according to the contract." About a week from first call to signature.
- The General Data CompanyPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- No figure published; scope, uses, recipients and payment are set out in writing.
- How the holder is paid
- "Payment follows the agreed milestones." No file moves before a signed agreement.
- MagmaPublishes no rule: worth asking
- Publishes about price
- "A revenue share, paid as your data licenses." No percentage published.
- How the holder is paid
- As the data licenses, under the data agreement signed during onboarding.
- Scale AIOutside a published rule
It asks for 40+ employees.
- Publishes about price
- "$10K–$1M+ illustrative value per data partnership", scaling with how often data is delivered.
- How the holder is paid
- Not published. A scoping call first; a partnership can begin with a very limited scope.
- SunsetOutside a published rule
It takes companies that are closing or closed.
- Publishes about price
- Not published
- How the holder is paid
- Not published
A published rule is not a decision: every buyer evaluates the data before it offers anything. We are not the agent of any buyer listed.
Want all of them to see it at once? Offer it through us