You build graded tasks and environments. Labs buy them ready-made, and pay for graders that cannot be fooled.

Teams and experts who build training environments, graded task sets and private evaluations: in software, CAD and PCB design, chip design, formal proofs, science and professional work.

4

buyers quoted below on what they want from companies like yours

5 of 7

kinds of record below that the valuation measures or values

1

lot like yours among those a lab buyer chose on 12 Oct 2026

What companies like yours hold

What you typically have, where it sits, and whether the valuation can measure or value it. Buyers price what exists together, over how many years, and how well it links.

  • Graded task sets
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    Tasks with an automatic grader each, in containers that run anywhere. The engineering set a lab buyer chose on 12 October held 12K+ containerised tasks, all graded automatically.
    How the valuation reads it
    Value a task setpriced on its own, per task
  • Engineering design tasks
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    CAD and PCB design (3,400 tasks in that set) and chip design with testbenches and coverage (9,400).
    How the valuation reads it
    Value a task setpriced on its own, per task
  • Formal proofs
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    Lean proof tasks checked by the proof assistant (1,500 in that set).
    How the valuation reads it
    Value a task setpriced on its own, per task
  • Research and writing tasks scored on rubrics
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    Hypotheses, experiment designs, grant sections and responses to peer review. The science environment chosen the same day had 400+ evaluation tasks across 7 tracks.
    How the valuation reads it
    Value a task setpriced on its own, per task
  • Simulated apps and workplaces
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    Working replicas of software for an agent to practise in, with seeded data and checks.
    How the valuation reads it
    Describe it in your offer
  • Private evaluation sets
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    Questions or tasks never published, with expert solutions.
    How the valuation reads it
    Value a task setpriced on its own, per task
  • Build and run history
    Where it sits, and what the evidence shows
    The repositories that build each environment, and logs of model attempts and grader results.
    How the valuation reads it
    Describe it in your offer

What buyers say they want from companies like you

In their own words, from their own pages or from reporting on what they bought. Each opens its source.

  • “Math and coding tasks came first, but we're now seeing significant growth in enterprise workflows: tasks like navigating Salesforce, filing reports, or manipulating spreadsheets.”
    Epoch AI interviewsAs reported, 12 Jan 2026
  • “Contract sizes are often six to seven figures per quarter.”
    Epoch AI interviewsAs reported, 12 Jan 2026
  • “Opportunities are usually priced per task, at around $500 to $1,500 a task, with hundreds to thousands of tasks per request.”
    HUD DataVendorIts own page, 12 Oct 2026
  • “Scale AI wrote in February that nearly half of its new data-training projects involve reinforcement-learning environments.”
    Scale AI, per FortuneAs reported, 1 Oct 2026
  • “private, uncontaminated eval sets because public benchmarks have leaked into pretraining data.”
    Labs, per a practitioner (Gokul Rajaram)As reported, 11 Oct 2026

What raises the value

  • Sound graders: "Soundness matters most: high reward must mean the task was actually solved, not hacked" (Epoch AI interviews).
  • Difficulty set so current models pass sometimes, not always.
  • A professional domain where the builder has real expertise: engineering, chip design, proofs, science, finance, law.
  • Scarce source material: chip designers "guard their IP closely", so little open data exists to train on (TechCrunch, 1 Apr 2026).
  • Tasks never published anywhere, so no model has seen them.
  • Exclusivity, when the buyer pays for it: "exclusive deals are roughly 4-5x more expensive than non-exclusive ones" (Epoch AI interviews).
  • Containers that build and run cleanly, with documentation a lab's team can use without the builder.

What lowers it

  • Plain maths problems and static benchmark-style tasks: "math tasks are easy to create but don't transfer as well to other capabilities" (Epoch AI interviews).
  • Quickly built replica websites: "what everyone does is vibe code a buggy website which isn't useful" (Epoch AI interviews).
  • Tasks current models already pass. In one practitioner's words, "The product depreciates by succeeding."
  • Graders that reward shortcuts or can be gamed.
  • Tasks that leaked online or were derived from public benchmarks.

A line that quotes a buyer names it. The others are our checklist, drawn from the factors buyers state in general: no buyer publishes how much each one moves a price. How often each factor matters across 156 kinds of data.

The rights to settle first

These stop a sale more often than price does. Each can be settled before any buyer sees a record.

The full rights checklist
  • You must own the environment and everything inside it. Tasks derived from someone else's proprietary material carry that material's restrictions.
  • Chip-design tasks: foundry design-kit and EDA tool licence terms, third-party IP cores and export control.
  • Tasks written by contractors or experts need an assignment of rights to you, and their contracts must allow resale.
  • Proof and science tasks built on published papers or problem sets carry the source's licence.
  • Selling a private evaluation set exclusively ends your own use of it; selling it to several buyers lowers what each pays.

A recent purchase that fits

One of five lots a lab buyer went for on 12 Oct 2026, wanting to close in under a week. No price was given.

All five lots
Seller
Builder of engineering training environments
People
Not stated
History
Not stated
Size
12K+ containerised tasks
What was inside
  • 3,400 CAD and PCB design tasks
  • 9,400 chip-design tasks
  • 1,500 Lean proof tasks
  • All graded automatically

Source: A buyer-side referral network's announcement to its members, 12 October 2026 (reported to us).

What is already on offer from companies like you

Read this morning from the brokers' and marketplaces' own catalogues. A buyer compares your records with these; settled rights, more years and more linked systems are what set one apart.

73

lots on offer like yours

5.5 years

of history in the middle of them

18 of 73

say the rights are settled

What holders like you ask

Who buys finished environments?
Labs buy mostly through vendors and marketplaces rather than from builders: of 15 labs we checked, only Google runs a self-serve route for outside sellers. DataVendor (HUD) lists environments and task sets from builders for lab research teams, Prime Intellect pays bounties for environments it releases open source, and on 12 October one lab buyer chose two environment lots, an engineering task set and a science research environment.
What does a graded task sell for?
HUD DataVendor says opportunities are "usually priced per task, at around $500 to $1,500 a task, with hundreds to thousands of tasks per request". The valuation prices a task set from what the market's records say one task fetches in its field, times how many tasks it holds; where the middle lands follows what task buyers ask for: graded automatically, running as an environment, never published. Exclusive deals run roughly 4 to 5 times a non-exclusive one (Epoch AI interviews). No price was given for the two environment lots chosen on 12 October.
Do maths and coding tasks still sell?
Plain maths problems sell less well: "math tasks are easy to create but don't transfer as well to other capabilities" (Epoch AI interviews). Formal proofs differ in one way buyers care about: a proof assistant checks them, so the grade cannot be gamed. The engineering lot chosen on 12 October held 1,500 Lean proof tasks beside 12,800 CAD, PCB and chip-design tasks.
How long does an environment stay valuable?
Not long. Practitioners put an environment's useful life at about six months, because models learn to pass it: "The product depreciates by succeeding." Sell while current models still fail some of the time, and keep building.
Should we sell exclusively?
It is a price, not a default. Exclusive deals run roughly 4 to 5 times a non-exclusive one (Epoch AI interviews), but an exclusive sale ends your ability to sell the same set again, and an environment's useful life is short. A sale with several buyers shows what each pays for each kind of licence before you choose.

Value your task set by its field, grading and how it runs. A description is enough to start: no files and no access.

Selling training environments and graded task sets to AI labs | AIData.Broker