Bartz v. Anthropic: order on fair use (summary judgment)
Summary judgment for Anthropic on training use and print-to-digital conversion; pirated library copies sent to trial (the case then settled).
Dated 23 Jun 2025Source checked 23 Jun 2025Page out of reach at the last check, 17 Oct 2026Basis: stated
In the source's own words
“This order grants summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use was a fair use. ... We will have a trial on the pirated copies used to create Anthropic’s central library and the resulting damages, actual or statutory (including for willfulness).”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- Bartz v. Anthropic, order on fair use (23 June 2025): training was transformative (Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417-WHA (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025), Dkt. 231, at 13)
- Bartz v. Anthropic, order on fair use (23 June 2025): pirated library copies (Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417-WHA (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025), Dkt. 231, at 19)
- Bartz v. Anthropic, order on fair use (23 June 2025): the market for licensing books for training (Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417-WHA (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025), Dkt. 231, at 28)
- Bartz v. Anthropic, order on fair use (23 June 2025): the central library (Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417-WHA (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2025), Dkt. 231, at 2)
What it is about
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in these 3 guides